It is common for each member of family to have their own piece of modern technology. Some people think this will lead them to break down of family
relationships and communication. To what extent do you agree?
The importance of communication among family members is very important and even it is becoming controversial that every member having a piece of modern technology is favorable or it breaks the family ties. This is quite controversial that usage of technology has no demerits but its over-usage and misuse can break the family.
Analyzing the statement and explaining further, I partially agree with the statement, The most preponderant reason is that every member having an individual piece of technology and use it continuously for long hours breaks the communication between each other and person starts seeping into the virtual world, this can be a lead cause of breakdown of the family.
Explaining further, modern piece of technology is a positive sign of growth as it develops international relations and provide global vision to the people. Smart phone with uncountable apps is a source of information and entertainment. So negatives only crop up with over indulgence and misuse otherwise it is tool which connect the people all over the world.
To recapitulate, according to arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to the conclusion that technology is the backbone for the progress of country and its disadvantages can be overlooked now. But the balance should be maintained to keep the family relationships sustainable.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant
- SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT NOT ENOUGH OF THE WASTE FROM HOMES IS RECYCLED They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
- Most young people without a partner would prefer to have a boyfriend or girlfriend yet being in a relationship when you are young is not always a good idea as part of a class project write about whether you agree or disagree give reasons for your answer 61
- Mobile phones and the Internet have made it easy to stay in contact with other people However as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers there is less face to face contact and direct communication Is the growing use of communications technol 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37914691943 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20792520554 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592417061611 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.3640550229 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.875 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26832446988 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984726451926 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868686726601 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14606218606 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765339638613 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37914691943 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20792520554 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592417061611 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.3640550229 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.875 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26832446988 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984726451926 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868686726601 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14606218606 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765339638613 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.