Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than solve. Do you agree or disagree ?
As a result of the widespread use of technology, the world has encountered numerous issues. Some believe that technology cause more harm than good to modern communities. I balance with this argument and this essay will discuss both sides of he arguments.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of technology have more benefits and solve problem for modern society. First, technology devices believed to serve people’s live and balance life regardless of their family background. This technology support, presumably not only to increase overall human communicate of lower income-people but also make international relationships, which eventually promotes an modern and egalitarian society. By using technological devices such as mobile phone and tablets, nowadays, people, especially, older, are now able to keep in touch with their family or friend, following newsletters regardless geography distance. Meanwhile, when people want to send a message to someone, it takes a long time because message will be sent by means of transport in the past. Second, technology devices would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledgeable that skilled and technological devices is imperative to foster economic growth and living conditions in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once development technology devices. First, developed technology for modern society would likely correspond with many disadvantages. First, when technology devices is spread in any nations, would probably some countries today posses the capabilities to employ advanced technology for warfare to their own benefit. Example, developed nations such as US or Russia have the potential of devastating less economically advanced sovereign territories by shutting down their power grids, healthcare and entire communication systems if the need arises. Second, technology is overdeveloped would tempt many young children using Internet or social media such as Facebook or Instagram. When children using technology at a too early age, it’s easy to get bad websites to spread bad things, thereby great burdens for education children and government staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable education websites. It, instead, would be a more technology viable option if the resources were focused on supporting economic government.
I were discussed this argument. In my opinion, I believed this development technology have an doubled edged-sword.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- In some countries more and more are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reason for this How can people can research this 73
- Some people think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problem Give your option 63
- The best way for a government to prepare for the future is to invest in young people To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Pollution and environment damage result from developing and making the country richer To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of the arguments'?
Suggestion: of the arguments
... and this essay will discuss both sides of he arguments. Admittedly, there are some argument i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...elationships, which eventually promotes an modern and egalitarian society. By usin...
^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
...d on supporting economic government. I were discussed this argument. In my opinion,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...lieved this development technology have an doubled edged-sword.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72378516624 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04894520704 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598465473146 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2464007959 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.789473684 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28513326361 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940774081796 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103541381822 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164715324594 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585111026245 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.