Many companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think this is good for the world of sports. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there are many companies using sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people believed that this is good for sports world, while others believed there are disadvantages of this. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of sports as a way to advertise for companies is good for world. First, companies subsidies for sports are believed to equalize sports opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their background. This advertise support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall information sports rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, using sports for advertising would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, would benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and advertising strategy human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. First, using sports for advertising would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income for advertise and product, companies could over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, sponsor sports for advertise would tempt many young people including those who are not sports inclined or show no interest in sports event pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for companies admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable advertise paths. It, instead, would be a more advertise viable option if the resources were focused on supporting sports lover.
In conclusion, in this life, advertising become an important part of companies. Personally, I hold positive attitude towards increased better products in terms of global sporting matters and cultural exchange, however, we should be alert to the potential risk of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- Studies imply many teen these days fancy socializing online to meeting one another in person I think because they don t have much time to meet outside so they prefer to meet outside so they prefer to meet online 56
- The bar charts show information about passable house expenses in England London and to hand over the equivalence in respect to the passable house cost between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 56
- Some people say we do not need printed papers newspaper anymore as there are other means To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is good for the world of sports Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 588, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...pply of highly qualified workers, would benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 931, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...he resources were focused on supporting sports lover. In conclusion, in this life, ad...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63556851312 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93414995316 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6042782849 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.866666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424826986407 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159481361796 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106778513339 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274670514578 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109527711399 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 588, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...pply of highly qualified workers, would benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 931, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...he resources were focused on supporting sports lover. In conclusion, in this life, ad...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63556851312 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93414995316 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6042782849 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.866666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424826986407 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159481361796 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106778513339 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274670514578 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109527711399 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.