Some people believe that the media, such as the press, TV and Internet should be more strictly controlled. Are you for or against this view.
In this day and age, social media which is worldwide covered consists of many types of contents and topics. Its diversity has been a matter of concern thus it is believed that the media should be under strict surveillance. From my perspective, this belief is partly true.
In addition to positive and constructive content for the betterment of society, there exist many other negative matters which are the reasons why cyberspace should be tightly censored. Adverse impact on the children is the first explanation. In other words, the young generation may expose to violent content, anti-Communist Parties of Vietnam propaganda or pornographic material on television channel or the internet, making them have erroneous thoughts. For instance, recently in Vietnam, many violent and obscene videos were released on youtube, turning many children into fans of bad influencers in society, even idolizing them, which was fortunately handled. Next, fake news is spreading constantly on social networking sites, resulting in panic in public. To explain, in order to boost ratings and earn profits quickly, many media houses often put out sensational affairs that likely make viewers have distorted viewpoints.
On the other hand, there are valid reasons why many critics believe that the government should control the mass media less and provide more rights to citizens to connect with various information on these digital gadgets. Take North Korea for example, people there must not access networking sites, their viewing contents are rigorously restricted by the authorities. This leads to one-way information circumstances and the residents are unlikely to know the other side of the world. Furthermore, social fairness and security would be ensured with a freer network. In more detail, people might easily condemn injustice done by irresponsible authorities, which was not possible before. Also, criminals can not be freely active when their images are spread on social networks, which makes it easy for citizens to proactively avoid and probably inform the police to arrest them.
To sum up, while it is true that regulations of the media should be incentivized, it is also beneficial to some extent to make a well-formed opinion on issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-19 | levanhoan123 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | levanhoan123 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 52
- Some people believe that the media such as the press TV and Internet should be more strictly controlled Are you for or against this view 89
- Long distance flights use more fuel than cars and pollute the environment We should discourage non essential flights instead of limiting the use of the car To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are need by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons of the media should be incentivized, it is also beneficial to some extent to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, may, so, thus, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39488636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80857594712 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633522727273 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3782200434 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6875 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2293818707 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645114076879 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051987559623 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139676143334 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484927103315 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.