The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities in 2000.
The bar chart above illustrates the lowest and highest air emissions extent of 4 crowded cites in 2000. Inferring from the clear-cut data of the chart, it stands to reason that the pollutants emitted by various factors in Mexico took the unwanted lead.
Practically, there were two observable tendencies among 4 different cities, Los Angeles and Mexico City tended to have the maximum and minimum amount of N2O higher than the similar aspects of SO2. In Mexico City, staggeringly, the maximum SO2 and the maximum N2O given off into the air were the highest of all 4 cities, with the highest average 207 micrograms per m3 and 200 micrograms per m3, approximately 2 times as much as the maximum amount of SO2 emissions in Beijing. The minimum amount of N2O and SO2 brought into the environment were also the highest when they got to the daily average of 113 micrograms per m3 and 80 micrograms per m3. On the other hand, the air in Los Angeles was way less polluted by SO2 and N2O emissions, having the average maximum N2O emissions nearly the same as the average minimum N2O emissions of Mexico City per day.
In contrast to Los Angeles and Mexico City, the atmosphere in Calcutta and Beijing were likely to be more affected by N2O than by SO2. The daily average minimum SO2 in Calcutta reached to 47 micrograms per m3 and 25 micrograms per m3 in Beijing, such figures of the N2O were 30 micrograms per m3 and 14 micrograms per m3.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | hangbuizim | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhinhi999 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'emissions'' or 'emission's'?
Suggestion: emissions'; emission's
... illustrates the lowest and highest air emissions extent of 4 crowded cites in 2000. Infe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62745098039 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56751659859 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462745098039 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4391987698 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.875 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214081708022 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10487981842 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601638999946 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141733476795 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652089810389 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.