The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities in 2000 Summarise the information and Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities in 2000. Summarise the information and Write at least 150 words.

Given is the bar chart depicting the average minimum and maximum levels of SO2 and N20, which caused pollution in four distinct areas, namely Los Angeles, Calcutta, Bejing, and Mexico City on a daily basis in 2000.

It is conspicuous that Mexico City had the highest figures for contaminants compared to the three remaining cities. Besides, the amount of N20 in the atmosphere in Los Angeles and Mexico City was higher than that of SO2, while the reverse was true for Calcutta and Beijing.

Perceptibly, the maximum figure of N20 was emitted dominantly in Mexico City with 207 micrograms per m3 which were higher more than twofold than the smallest data. Moreover, these figures were slightly higher than the release of SO2 with 200 and 80 micrograms per m3, respectively. Similarly, this pattern happened in Los Angeles where the amount of N2O raged from 39 to 104 micrograms per m3; however, SO2 pollutant was discharged negligibly.

When it comes to the number of air pollutants released in Calcutta and Beijing, 100 and lower four times microgram per m3 SO2 was the highest and lowest figures documented in the latter metropolis while in the former city this quantity not disparity significantly from 47 to 59 microgram per m3. Additionally, the amount of N20 was under 55 micrograms per m3 in both areas.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-01 nhinhi999 73 view
Essays by user nhinhi999 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were slightly higher than the release of SO2 with 200 and 80 micrograms per m3, r...
^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'microgram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'micrograms'.
Suggestion: micrograms
...t disparity significantly from 47 to 59 microgram per m3. Additionally, the amount of N20...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98642533937 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6901584638 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0357041684 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117774507236 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579759368595 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812184247796 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976746270115 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097534516505 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.