The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
Write at least 150 words.
Given is a pie chart delineating the proportions of people volunteering in various kinds of organisations during a 6-year period, commencing from 2008.
It is perceptible that there was a surge in the percentage of environmental, health care and sport while the reverse was true for art, education and others.
In 2008, the proportion of education was up to 24%, followed by environmental with 21%. The third rank was art with 18% and next was sport with only 15%. The rest was health care with 7%. While the remaining accounted for 15%.
6 year later brought a sea change in the proportions of people volunteering in various kinds of organisations. The leader was environmental with a drastic leap to 29% while the second rank was sport with 25%. Even though education slumped, yet it remained in its original position as the third, followed by art when it slumped to 12%. Even though health care has increased, it still ranks 5th. The similar trend was observed in other producers with 9%
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 73
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many young people nowadays tend to put things off Why is this the case What are the consequences What can these people do to avoid procrastination 95
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89411764706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88196876191 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9385752335 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6363636364 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0524615238975 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0220224518807 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353346744266 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468355256164 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413138685215 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.