You should spend about 20 minutes on this task
The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
Write at least 150 words.
Given are the two pie charts delineating the number of volunteers by seven disntic organizations during a 6-year period, commencing from 2008.
It is conspicuous that the rate of people belonging to environmental, sports, health care groups surged by years, while the reverse was true for art, educational and others’. Furthermore, the environmental institution’s percentage was highest in the final year.
When it comes to the figure of members of environmental group, beginning with 21% in 2008, it then leaped to 29% in the next six years. Sports’ share the similar trend with the aforementioned one, 25% which was the second highest point recorded after a 10-percent rise. Health care got the fewest swelling points with only 1% surveyed from 7%.
In terms of that rate of environmental organization, its beginning was 24%; however; it brought a plunge with 17% left in the second given year so it ranked third.Coincidentally, art’s seemed to shrink to 12% from 18% in the 2008s as well. Together with only 9% reported from 15%, it was easy to know why the second lowest rank belonged to it
- The table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000 Summarise the information and Write at least 150 words 67
- In some countries more and more people becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are reasons for this How can people research this 88
- The graph below shows the number of passengers using three railway networks from 1950 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two pie charts delineating the numb...
^^^
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rts delineating the number of volunteers by seven disntic organizations during a ...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Coincidentally
...he second given year so it ranked third.Coincidentally, art’s seemed to shrink to 12% from 18%...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, incidentally, second, so, then, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09836065574 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16225877464 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661202185792 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1271819974 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0471396856486 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241451645203 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040581589598 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0401207131881 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490159305513 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.