The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs illustrate the proportion of households consuming 3 different kinds of electrical appliances and the average number of time families in a nation spent on doing household chores in the same period of time, from 1920 to 2019.
It’s clear that the washing machine had become less popular than the refrigerator and the vacuum cleaner before the end of that period of time. The latter percentage of those three appliances was higher than the former. And people particularly spent less time each year on doing housework in a week over a period of a century.
Looking at the percentage of households with electrical equipment, in 1920 the washing machine accounted for 40%, nearly a third of households owning the vacuum cleaner, while approximately none of them had the refrigerator. However, a significant upward trend had been witnessed in the proportion of the refrigerator, specifically 90% in 1960. The figure for vacuum cleaners increased gradually and reached the same percentage as the refrigerator did, in 2000. In contrast, the washing machine had a periodic fluctuation and stood at nearly 70%. In the last 20 years, all households in this country had refrigerators and vacuum cleaners.
According to the second graph, in 1920, each family spent an average of around 50 hours per week on housework. And there was a near fivefold decrease in the number of time people spent on household chores over the following century. By the hundredth year of this period, the average weekly amount of time had fallen to just over 10 hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-21 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | huyen_duong | 73 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- Some people think that schools should invest more money in technology such as more computers while others think more money should be spent on teachers Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 80
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t on doing household chores in the same period of time, from 1920 to 2019. It’s clear that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e vacuum cleaner before the end of that period of time. The latter percentage of those three a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06614785992 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84687194283 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529182879377 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6243527806 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151025861474 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557501518546 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532758397943 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108139845055 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552298076337 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.