Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language could still be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The role of technology is becoming significantly increasing in recent years. Despite the advent of many translation applications for the time being, acquiring other languages remain valuable for people. I competely agree with this statement because there are many merits associated with studying new languages.
Knowing another language faciliates leaner's work and provides them with many opportunities in professional career. First, by having a good command of additional language, workers stand a higher chance of enhancing their productivity. This is particularly the case for those working with foreign coleagues. Given the language barrier is removed, people can communicate with each other easily the efficiency will therefore be enhanced. In addition, workers who can use another language would be often considered for jobs working in other countries, which is a great chance for them as these positions normally go hand in hand with salary increment, extra perks, allowances and promotion opportunity. By contrast, deployment of automated language translation softwares could result in dire consequences if there are technical glitches.
Other benefits of studying languages could be seen in people's private life. It is well-known that to establish a long lasting and meaningful relationships, face-to-face interaction is unavoidable. People have to see others' appearance, body language and hear their voices so that they can decide that people can put trust the others or not. With technological interference, such advantages maybe offset. More importantly, translating applications can not imitate cultural, societal and traditional factors in conversations. The lack of these components disables talkers to build rapport and causes misinformation and misunderstanding when people communicating. Finally, as learners study new languages, they absorb numerous values of a culture simultaneously, which make them more well-rounded individuals. Thus, Learning a language could benefit many ways to persons.
In sum, technology application for translating between languages appear quick and convenient, however learning a new language could supply people with many merits. I believe that the ability to use other languages is still significant in our lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | nvtrung309 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanhcass | 89 | view |
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain young people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born What is your opinion 73
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school and unable to find jobs after graduation What problems do you think youth unemployment will cause to the individual and society Give reasons and make some suggestions 89
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would often be
...n, workers who can use another language would be often considered for jobs working in other co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8905775076 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23762000182 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635258358663 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0555213043 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165240792535 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546633128163 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055448122473 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110482293867 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404498171383 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.