Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The time we are living now cannot think without sciences. From the mundane aspects of life to the most exclusive without sciences life is unthinkable. Does the science always do the betterment? The answer would probably be no. There is a famous saying that ‘science and technology are the keys of both our longevity and demise.’ Science has two parts-one is constructive and the other is destructive. So, blatantly saying that Government should place no restriction is dangerous.
Take for instance the situation of scientific research on nuclear bomb or prohibited medicine. Both have significantly deleterious impact. In terms of nuclear bomb, we can recall the tragic history of Hiroshima Nagasaki. I still remember while studying history book as a child I was confounded to think that how can someone made such things that kills people. The consequences of nuclear bombing in Hiroshima Nagasaki are still evident. The land is still unsuitable for farming and the new-borns near to that place still show range of disabilities. Moreover, many people still suffer from mental trauma due to such heinous act.
Now let’s focus on prohibited medicine like LSD, cocaine, or heroin- there are so many known unknown prohibited medicines often called as illegal or street medicine. Such drugs often have deadly impact on the body and mind ranging from creating mere hallucination to uncontrollable addiction, sometimes people kill themselves. The addiction is sometimes such unbridled that people may engage various illegal jobs to arrange the money to buy this.
Needless to say, that illegal medicine is infamously profitable business. Drug dealers, all over the world are actively fund such kind of so-called scientific research. In fact, many politicians are directly linked with such acts.
The above examples are the destructive aspects of scientific research. This is parallelly happening with the constructive ones. If government do not place any restriction, the things will be much worser. Therefore, for such kind of scientific studies, government should be restrictive. In fact, government should take strict steps those fund this kind of acts.
However, what if the scientific research is more about human welfare? Let’s consider the development of Artificial Intelligence more specifically. Development of medicine and surgery procedure are substantially visible in this era. Once, during operation patients felt the pain, now we have anaesthesia, once people died due to mere influenza, now we have cheap yet life saving vaccine. All of these are possible because of scientific research. As a most recent example we can talk about Covid-19 pandemic. From 2020, worldwide people suffer from deadly corona virus. Millions of people died and still suffering. Again, scientific research in the place of protector. After several trial and error, in 2021 people got the most awaited vaccine. After that now in 2022 that virulent virus is controlled, all thanks to the scientific researchers. Needless to say for this kind of research government should not place any restriction, moreover, government should provide more fund and should encourage private organization to fund such kind of research.
In conclusion, as science is like a coin and has two completely opposite characteristics, government should be thoughtful whether the restriction will be place or not. When scientific research will be related to any kind of fishy things government should intervene and immediately stall the process. On the other hand, for the welfare of society government should provide support and independence to conduct scientific research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 54
- Students should fund their education with part time work that they do while they study 66
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 83
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'funded'.
Suggestion: funded
...ealers, all over the world are actively fund such kind of so-called scientific resea...
^^^^
Line 11, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ossible because of scientific research. As a most recent example we can talk about...
^^
Line 11, column 674, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun trial seems to be countable; consider using: 'several trials'.
Suggestion: several trials
...search in the place of protector. After several trial and error, in 2021 people got the most ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...ch will be related to any kind of fishy things government should intervene and immedia...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3094.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47610619469 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93121391857 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506194690265 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 937.8 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 39.0 20.2370786517 193% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8284276181 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3333333333 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4871794872 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10256410256 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 5.13820224719 370% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168232494965 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423715929716 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491432709896 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846997355916 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616578428854 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.