Many people value long-lasting friendships. Which ONE of the following qualities do you think is most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time? Why?
They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong.
They have similar interests and similar views on important topics.
They trust each other completely.
As we all know, human beings are social animals, and the biggest enemy in our lives is alienation. Thus, it is beneficial to possess a long-lasting friendship. Nevertheless, when comes to this topic, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that friends who have similar interests with us enable the friendship to last for a long time, while others hold a different viewpoint that trust determines the quality of friendship. As far as I am concerned, I believe friends who always give hands to us whenever we are facing a crisis are the prerequisite for a long-lasting friendship.
In the first place, as a renowned saying goes, "a friend in need is a friend indeed". In a long-lasting friendship, a good friend can offer some assistance to you when you are facing either an emotional crisis or a financial crisis. To illustrate, when you are enduring too much pressure caused by earning money and living, a genuine friend will be willing to sit beside you and listen to your complaints with patience. In front of this kind of friend, you can vent your emotions with ease and never need to pretend to be another person. When you are imposed too much financial burden resulting from the expensive fee of renting a room or you need some money for some urgent affairs, this type of friend will be enthusiastic about your difficulties and spare no efforts to aid you to escape from this terrible situation. With this kind of friendship, you can not only share happiness but also sorrow.
On the other hand, although it is undeniable that we can enjoy a lot of pleasure with friends who possess similar interests and viewpoints to us, the interest can change as we age. For example, when I and a friend were in primary school, we were indulged in the magical world created by the Harry Potter series. But after entering the university, our interests enormously changed. I prefer spending time reading psychological research papers, while my old friends would like to invest more time and energy in photography. Thus, we were not able to express our ideas efficiently anymore, and the friendship even eventually faded off.
In addition, we have to admit that trust is like the concrete frame of architecture, without which any friendship cannot be generated. Nevertheless, the fact that we attach great importance to trust does not justify that trust is the only and the most essential element of a friendship. Sometimes, the circumstance that a friend who totally trusts you but does not do any further action to provide help to you can hurt your heart more severely. A friend who only has trust cannot help you grapple with a crisis emerging from life.
In a nutshell, we ought to make more emphasis on the significance of possessing friends that assist us when we are mired in troubles since this type of good companion can not only relieve our loneliness and pressure but also light the candle when we are walking in the darkness.
- Social media is the best way to express personal views 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. 73
- Some people believe that all the nations should use taxes to fund universities so that they could offer free university education to any student What is your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and TV programs made in one s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, kind of, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2453.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84782608696 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78189627176 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505928853755 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2172936039 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.80952381 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0952380952 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224624435821 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769188998782 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790574935247 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126949735968 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984528531016 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.