It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives. How could robots be used in the future? Will this development be a positive or a negative development?
The enhancement in robotics and engineering has recently became the key topic for the tempestuous debates. In this regard, the impending tendency of the robot- controlled machinery's excessive usage has been forecasted. I reckon that robots could be beneficial both in medicine and military fields since such a trend will cause the auspicious consequences.
Robots can be successfully introduced into medical and military spheres for increasing the general KPI level. Surgeries may be optimized through involving new technologies for carrying sophisticated procedures. Such an approach would assist in eliminating the possibility of flaws and human related factors. For instance, according to an authoritative Russian scientist Kim V. I., inducing the implementation of robotic surgeries is sure to boost the annual capacity up to 26% . Moreover, military field could also benefit from adopting the books of engineering. For example, as per the analytics from Kesarev consulting, the efficiency of the Russian sea frontier forces are to react faster to the boundary provocations. Thus, medicine and military branches are likely to gain a plethora of cons from implementing robots.
I firmly believe that the trend on the excessive usage of robots is essential for creating a prosperous society. First of all, such a tendency is fruitful due to vanishing the probability of errors. Secondly, employing computer- aided support into the day-to-day routine will save time for another tasks. For instance, Norwegian hospitals report that the drift to the robotics assistance provides spare time for treating a larger number of patients. Thereby, the marked sway to adopting robots in routine activities contains a lot of positive aspects.
To sum up, robots may be used in a variety of spheres which is sure to be effective and result in augmentation of general capacity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-06 | Guiseppe59192 | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
- Some people think that couples should live together before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable 84
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and they do not change their usual habits.Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you prefer? Explain why? 78
- Electric vehicles are far less damaging to the environment when compared to gasoline cars This is why governments all around the world should promote the manufacturing and use of electric cars To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your 89
- The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...n robotics and engineering has recently became the key topic for the tempestuous debat...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e to boost the annual capacity up to 26% . Moreover, military field could also ben...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i reckon, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50519031142 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06528450301 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61937716263 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0509005379 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5882352941 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207309151473 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627883164687 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600549441317 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144962133928 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504446144958 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.