non
The reading passage has proposed three reasons to explain some problems that would happen during the project of sending humans to Mars. The professor's lecture deals with the same issue but contradicts the reading passage content by using three specific points to support her notion.
First, in the reading passage, it is suggested that the spaceship doesn't have enough space to take supplies of food, water, and oxygen, which are used for a two-year-long trip. In contrast, the professor in the lecture holds a different opinion that the scientist can use a technology called hydroponic, which can grow plant in water without soil. And this not only can save much space but also can imply food from plants. Astronauts can get pure water and flash air form plants.
The second point is that astronauts will have muscle mass and lower bone density in the zero-gravity environment for two years long. The reading claims that astronauts will take months training for adapt to this condition, and scientists also use some technology to keep their health. For example, regular exercise can decrease muscle mass and some vitamins can help hold their bone density.
The third point the author states is that astronauts will be in danger for space radiation without Earth’s magnetic field. Nonetheless, the lecture points out that astronauts will expose to the Sun radiation, but it doesn’t have the danger to humans all the time. Special instruments and equipments can help astronauts avoid deadly radiation like monitoring solar radiation, and with a small shelter that is shielded against radiation but doesn’t add much weight to the ship. Astronauts can do the regular job and work most of the time. When the Sun radiation increase, they can hide in a small area which will not take up much space until the danger passed.
The speaker's statement, therefore, is in sharp contrast to the point made in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-02 | ayumiyazaki | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 68 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-03 | Vivian Chang | 88 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | Nina Tsarevich | 85 | view |
- Problems of sending human to Mars 85
- Problems of sending human to Mars Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth t 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 90
- Problems of sending human to Mars 3
- non 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...age, it is suggested that the spaceship doesnt have enough space to take supplies of f...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...h space until the danger passed. The speakers statement, therefore, is in sharp contr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08176100629 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50137417239 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544025157233 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1281642399 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.