The chart below shows the depth of snow (cm) in a particular ski resort in Canada in three individual years
The vertical chart presents the variations in the depth of snow of a Canadian ski resort in three different years, in centimetres (cm). Overall, all three years registered a surge in the depth of snow, although some negligible fluctuations, with the first three months (not involving January) having the highest figures.
Starting at 100cm sharp, the depth of snow in the November of the first surveyed year experienced a moderate climb to January before witnessing a significant soar to merely 400cm in April. However, the figure in the second year recorded a slight fall to dive to its bottom in December before surging to the highest point in April (more than 450cm) to close the period.
In terms of the depth of snow in the last year, while the figure for the first three months from November to January rose marginally (increased by approximately 60cm), the figure for other months showed an inverse trend, from 350cm to 300cm as its finishing point.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-25 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-25 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | serebi2704 | 71 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | boppy2811 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-21 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 73 | view |
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil 61
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational equality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both view 84
- Some people think space research is a waste of money The government should spend that money on the improvement of people s living conditions To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
- The diagram shows a process of making a storage area from a material called concrete canvas 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91975308642 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56897680466 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6105755788 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.4 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282146881626 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156852336217 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108228826321 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186728474004 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113352878605 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.