The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

Given are the two maps delineating the predicted modifications of a university sports center over a course of time.
Perceptibly, the region is supposed to experience drastic modifications with the elimination of outdoor courts along with the addition of interior amenities.
The present university sports center is largely outdoors with two outdoor courts to the west and east. This center has a large building in the middle. Inside the building, the reception is opposite the main entrance and behind it is a 25-meter swimming pool. At the furthest point of north is a gym for those who wish to work out. Strikingly, the door on the left of the reception desk leads to the changing room, while the door on the right is seating.
After years of transformations, the two outdoor courts will be merged with the main building. On the west side will be constructed a large leisure pool, meanwhile the other a big sports hall and two studios for dancing to its east. Furthermore, the gym is planning to double in size while the existing facilities seemingly remain intact. Finally, there will be additional changing rooms, a new coffee and a sports shop on either side of the main entrance.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-15 Saul 67 view
2023-08-11 trikhung777 78 view
Essays by user kevann :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the predicted ...
^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...st. Furthermore, the gym is planning to double in size while the existing facilities seemingly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89108910891 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81801033302 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4581757777 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8181818182 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13071297642 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503561279951 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391869285914 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074228604887 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464318641433 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.