The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period 15 years.
The statistical line chart illustrates how much waste being discharged by three different firms in 5-year intervals starting from 2000, measured in tones.
Overall, company a and b produced the most contaminants in the beginning and tended to fall over the 15-year period while company c saw waste output increased considerably.
As indicated in the chart, in 2000, company a produced 12 tonnes of waste while the other two firms produced about 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of waste accordingly. In the next five years, the waste discharged by company b and c rose by around 2 tonnes whereas that of company a decreased by roughly 1 tonne.
Another considerable feature is the period from 2005 to 2015, company a cut waste production by nearly 4 tonnes and company b reduced its waste by around 7 tonnes. Conversely, company c witnessed an increase in waste production to over 9 tonnes while the amounts of waste from company a and b dropped significantly to approximately 8 tonnes and 3 tonnes accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses taxis and metro on vehicle free days Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
- more and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands what are the reasons do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- the pie charts show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, conversely, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91764705882 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99327967009 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 18.5980883128 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344529684155 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185936412489 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769047897128 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21726887482 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085162200356 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.