Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is axiomatic that the government is responsible for well being of its citizen and has to give them necessary services. The internet plays an important role in today’s sophisticated world, adversely affecting the entire society and their way of life. By considering this, I firmly believe that access to the internet has to be free for all the citizens in the country.
First, having the internet is important for having enlightened people. Nowadays, information come from the internert. If a student wants to fact check a subject or to find the answer to a question, has to look into the internet. Adults usually receive the news from pages on social media. With free internet, everyone can have access to the most recent information in the world, and this can lead to modern and educated communities, and it’s wrong that only reach people have access to this information. Also, poor students can use the internet to learn more about the subjects which they are learning in schools. So it’s necessary to offer everyone access to all the information on the internet to have an educated society.
Second, Having free internet can improve other services. No one can deny the importance of preventing roads and libraries from destruction. By giving free internet access to everyone, the traffic on roads becomes less, and they can last longer. If access to books becomes easier via the internet, fewer people are eager to go to libraries and borrow books from there. So, not having to pay for the internet can improve other services. It can also help online jobs at the same time. For example, when no one has to think about the cost of the internet, if a doctor doesn’t want to go to the hospital and work there, he can visit the patients online. This can make the hospital less crowded and help the doctor to earn some money. The internet is an excellent idea to save public places from more destruction.
In conclusion, It’s important that the internet must not cost money for citizens of each country. This is because the internet can educate people. Another reason is that the internet is an excellent solution to protect the destruction of places by helping them to be less crowded.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you 70
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and 60
- TPO 69 Task 1 70
- More and more people are working from home and telecommuting with their offices Is this a positive trend 90
- Question Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84350132626 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57775262378 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496021220159 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1062169797 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1363636364 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266242624102 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845653923561 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515322183807 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172961309271 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00795091982189 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84350132626 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57775262378 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496021220159 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1062169797 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1363636364 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266242624102 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845653923561 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515322183807 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172961309271 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00795091982189 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.