As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Does more knowledge make things more comprehensible or complex and mysterious? The views on this matter are subjective, depending on individuals. Knowledge, by definition, is the sound understanding of a particular subject matter. Some might argue that gaining more knowledge about a matter brings rise to more complex and mysterious insights, others may agree that acquiring more knowledge makes things more comprehensible rather than complex or mysterious. In my own view, after careful consideration, I believe that the acquisition of knowledge about things would give rise to more complex and mysterious insights.
As humans, we are wired, either consciously or unconsciously, to be curious and want to learn more as we progress. In science, for example, scientists thrive to be more knowledgeable about the subject matters in their field and this automatically gives rise to more complex and mysterious thinking which aids innovation and inventions. While it is true that knowledge may make things more comprehensible. Can we really know everything about a subject matter? With more comprehension comes complexity and mysteries. After all, most scientists today improve on innovations due to their sound knowledge in mathematics and science
The knowledge of fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and heat transfer makes it possible to improve on energy storage technologies. As people seek more knowledge on these subjects, new ideas that drives innovation and improvement funds way into their minds to solve some of the mysteries behind the improvement of renewable energy technologies.
In conclusion, it is obvious that more knowledge of things gives rise to complex and mysterious thinking. After all, the world around us keeps revolving and new things are being brought to life. The mere knowledge of things would not bring about innovation but rather stagnancy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-01 | wexoc | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-13 | Tammy__kk | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...y, to be curious and want to learn more as we progress. In science, for example, s...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g which aids innovation and inventions. While it is true that knowledge may make thin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ent funds way into their minds to solve some of the mysteries behind the improvement of ren...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56293706294 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16635178982 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534965034965 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.3835990454 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548429278229 0.243740707755 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220266206216 0.0831039109588 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194971160023 0.0758088955206 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340839619984 0.150359130593 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160215271553 0.0667264976115 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.