There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce, and money is the most important factor. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying that having the motivation to be loyal in the workforce is one of the most important aspects for workers and employees. In light of this, the most crucial element to motivate employees has become a topic of general interest among citizens. Although some people believe except the money, there is another more important factor which is the company's reputation, I would argue that only money can be the most vital thing to attract workers.
Some people give a reason why the company's reputation can be more important than money to motivate employees to stay in the workforce. An advocate for this opinion might argue that workers have a sense of self-pride to can work for such big businesses. Although maybe they are not paid a high salary, the outsiders still admire them because they believe only excellent figures can successfully apply for the company. Therefore creates satisfaction. However, big enterprises tend to have heavier workloads, so the employees' responsibilities are greater than they can comfortably manage. This leads workers to cope with stress more frequently and develop thoughts of quitting their jobs.
In my opinion, money is the most crucial element in persuading people to stay in the workforce. This is because most people apply for jobs to earn monthly salaries to pay for their living standards. Obviously, higher salaries are more appealing to attract workers to continue their affairs than low salaries. The average Vietnamese teachers, for example, have an alarmingly low salary. Many teachers complain they cannot pay for their daily fundamental expenditures. As a result, Vietnam is witnessing a tendency of more and more teachers to quit their jobs just because of the money issue.
In conclusion, many factors contribute to people staying in the company. However, money is still the most considerable concern as well as motivation for workers to decide whether they should stick with their jobs or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | student-a | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 78
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 73
- The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013 61
- Some people say that it is more important to spend money on improving roads and motorways than public transport 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...can successfully apply for the company. Therefore creates satisfaction. However, big ente...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18867924528 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73847195891 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5820210273 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0588235294 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190917085446 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687485475684 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800171678278 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147695970947 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079871934508 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.