Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
It is critically important that we aquire knowledge as much as possible in order to excel in our studies. The methods through which we gain useful information may differ from an individual to another. I personally believe that gathering useful information through electronic devices would suffice in our academic or professional endeavors. There are two reasons why I feel this way which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, it is easier to gain insightful information through electronic devices or internet than by perusing research papers. Through advancement in technology, a plethora of data and skills have been made available on the internet, such that would be cardinal to achieving our research goals. My personal experience is a compelling example to illustrate this point. During my final year of study in the university, I was to conduct an investigation on the geotechnical properties of iron ore tailings using an oedometer. My thesis supervisor, having explained the project outline, gave me some already published journals on a similar topic. It took me a number of days before I could bring out a point from the research papers. The reason was because the paper was too turgid and complex to understand. So, I checked online for similar projects and I came across a site where the processes to conduct my investigation were lucidly outlined. Through this online site, I was able to garner up necessary insights that helped me complete my project successfully. Had I not searched online, I could probably have been reading the vague research papers without gaining any knowledge eventually.
Furthermore, by searching through the internet, one can gain necessary skills which are not always available in research papers. For instance, during my undergraduate research, I needed to learn how to use boundary element method of numerical analysis through FLAC 3D software. So, I downloaded a few papers that could help me aquire the skill sets. However, the research papers only gave me theoretical knowledge of the software. It was when I began to watch YouTube tutorials through the internet that I could have a glimpse of how the software is used. Through the internet, I learnt FLAC 3D completely and I successfully achieved my project goals. This example clearly demonstrate that searching information through electronic devices is more helpful than studying research papers.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is better to search for information through electronic means than through research papers. This is because electronic devices provide us with information more easily and can help us gain insightful skills that are not always available in research papers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Huge Jackman | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | Mithun Chandra Banik | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds 76
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe Jazz music is extremely popular in the city of Monroe over 100 000 people attended Monroe s annual jazz festival last summer and 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 90
- Being consistent on one thing or trying different things to succeed 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26267281106 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94262635825 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9055564023 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3043478261 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212097622318 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630781133299 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796058107154 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151166955503 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522215820122 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.