Studies show that many criminals have a low level of education. For this reason, people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can get a job when leaving prison. Do you agree or disagree?
It is proven by scientists that people commit crimes owing to their lack of education. It is, therefore, thought that the most effective instrument to get rid of crimes is to equip prisoners with jobs. I somewhat agree with this perception as the approach opens the opportunity for the crininals making money and dodge the negative impacts from other criminals, albeit it may not work out for those who habitually violate the law.
It is a well-known fact that the main inducement of crime is money. If the people who have done wicked things are enabled to land a job, they can make their livelihood. By having a stable source of income, these people can shake off poverty and better themselves. In the long run, given the benefits received from their education when being imprisoned, former criminals can raise their living standards and become good citizens of their community.
Another merit of job training for people breaking the law is that it alienates them from the impacts of criminal peer effects, the phenomenon at which law-breakers under the pressure of their like-minded friends, re-offend the regulations. This would not only pose a threat to society but place them at risk of more severe sentences due to recidivism. The education for those who are used to violating the law, would ameliorate the implications that habitual criminal behaviors have on them.
Admittedly, there are law offenders who have a tendency to repeat their scrupulous acts, and either education or job training may not be sufficient for those people. As criminal behaviors integrate to some people's personalities and gradually become their nature. The educational support for them appears ineffective. However, these people are few, it thus still needs the interference of responsible individuals and organizations to provide proper work training for prisoners.
In sum, I mostly side with the view that people who are kept in prison should be educated to work. The method provides the former law-breakers with a chance to make their living and relieves them of the drive to re-commit crimes, even though it may not work on individuals who have the tendency to repeatedly disobey the law.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | thuydung0606 | 92 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Tran Phuong Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport Why is that What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more 78
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup and that the money would be better spent on other things However others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear positive impact on a co 84
- Intelligence is the most important quality of leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12849162011 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77464162055 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0656146467 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240319154479 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867212208584 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398703695292 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138989686002 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315450341122 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.