IN SOME COUNTRIES, MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE BECOMING INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OR BUILDING THEY LINE IN.
WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS?
HOW CAN PEOPLE RESEARCH THIS?
In many countries, citizens are taking more interest in the history of the residence they live. Taking precautionary measures before purchasing or selling a property and predicting the durability are the principal reason for this phenomenon. This information can be gathered by several ways such as using the Internet to look into housing websites as well as interviewing elder citizens.
The history of a house plays a key role in its sale value. For example, If an accommodation has a historic value, it can be counted as an antique which increases its price significantly. However, if a residence has any past of bad incidents, people fear that it will happen again. Thus, decreases its value therefore, personnel tend to learn about the past of houses before buying or selling the asset.
Again, as the climate changes due to various pollution, the lifespan of houses are becoming a major issue. For example, if the accommodation becomes old, it will require refurbishment earlier than expected. Hence, residents predict the age to refurbish before any occurrence could happen.
Searching information about residence now becoming easier than it used to. One can easily access to various housing related website to find his required data. Even though, this method may always not work, interviewing elder citizens can be an effective way. For example, all the localities contain certain communities which help the elders. Taking voluntary activities in these is a good way to learn something about pasttime.
In a nutshell, gathering knowledge about a home is gaining popularity. Assessing the resale value along with estimating its lifespan are the principal cause behind this trend. Although the use of world wide web is an easy way to research this, interrogating senior citizens is an effective way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-03 | jenifer Le | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | jenifer Le | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | jenifer Le | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 11
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other items with famous brands What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 11
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'accommodation'.
Suggestion: accommodation
...role in its sale value. For example, If an accommodation has a historic value, it can be counted...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26206896552 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88560328216 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 106.607317073 169% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 283.868780488 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8045021159 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.7777777778 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243184868513 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649437181299 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036297478749 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123284547146 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525021706411 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.