In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this?
It is true that there is an increasing number of people who are fond of researching and studying the history of the building where they live. This essay will discuss some rationale behind this trend and some possible ways that people can do to research this information.
There are a range of reasons why finding out about the history of one’s own accomodation is ecoming an increasingly common hobby among the general public. Firstly, comprehension of private houses or buildings is exceedingly useful. Unless people search and get information about how their houses were built or used in the past, they will not be able to repair their houses or do any procedures including changing owners or using purposes in the future with ease. From a personal perspective, people are interested in learning about their accomodations’ history because their houses are associated with special stories or things. For example, people become curious when they listen to mystery rumors about where they live and these stories encourage them to search for the history of their houses.
There are some methods that could be done to research their houses’ history. One predominant way is using the Internet. The reason is that these days the authorities tend to upload data about most fields of life on their website to manage information better with the help of cutting-edge technologies and allow their citizens to access the information easily. Therefore, the Internet becomes a mainstream source for all users to research about their houses’ history and using the Internet to search takes the precedence over other methods. Another possible way is asking people in old age brackets in their family. This is due to the fact that they have lived in the houses for a long time so their experiences can provide them better understanding of houses’ history.
In conclusion, there are some causes why people are interested in searching their accommodations’
history and there are a number of possible methods that people can try to find out this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 75
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 73
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... an increasingly common hobby among the general public. Firstly, comprehension of private hous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12574850299 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7549270678 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523952095808 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1236128309 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41116136118 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144724143765 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893046610011 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259077967783 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788735438154 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... an increasingly common hobby among the general public. Firstly, comprehension of private hous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12574850299 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7549270678 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523952095808 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1236128309 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41116136118 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144724143765 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893046610011 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259077967783 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788735438154 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.