Universities should spend more money in improving facilities like libraries and computer labs rather than hiring famous teachers?
In the past, students would flock to universities that boasted prestigious professors and luminary lecturers. Students enraptured with the celebrity status of the instructors would register at the university. However, today, students are placing more and more emphasis on other aspects of university facilities and services. It is my opinion that universities should not solely focus on hiring famous teachers.
The boom in technology-related professions has resulted in students demanding modem and sophisticated computer labs and research labs. These advanced facilities provide students with the hands-on experience needed to make the successful transition from student to working professional. Similarly, students studying humanities and liberal arts require access to a well-stocked library that carries the latest periodicals, books, and researches. Students studying sports medicine and athletics, on the other hand, will require modem, safe and sanitary recreation facilities like a fitness center and sports stadium. If a university’s facilities fail to meet potential student’s expectations, students will turn elsewhere to seek their education.
Students and their parents have also demonstrated the importance of dormitory housing when weighing their university options. Dorms that are outdated, unsafe, or located too far away from classrooms are no doubt unappealing to potential students. Administrators at universities have noticed this trend and have begun to upgrade student dormitories, focusing on accessibility for handicapped students, nighttime safety, and convenience when walking back and forth to classrooms. I know several students who were unwilling to attend a university because the dorm facilities were too inadequate.
Another aspect of university life that is often overlooked is health services. While most students may never require a visit to the university health office, the health office nonetheless offers indispensable services to those who do arrive. My university has medical professionals and specialist on-duty that evaluate and treat students. There are also counseling services and psychologists available for students who are dealing with high levels of stress or are distressed with home life. I think this emphasis on student physical and mental health is very important and helps create a harmonious campus.
While spending money to attract famous professors with illustrious credentials is important on one level, providing excellent facilities, forms, and health services should not be overlooked. Only by building a well-rounded university experience can administrators and educators provide a top-notch education for students.
- Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public while other people prefer to wait Which do you prefer and why Please include specific details in your answer 70
- Universities should spend more money in improving facilities like libraries and computer labs rather than hiring famous teachers 60
- More and more people are working from home and telecommuting with their offices Is this a positive trend 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it is important for government to provide money for things that are beautiful not just for things that are practical 60
- Do you think that young people should have several different types of jobs before they decide on a long term career 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, similarly, so, well, while, i think, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04960835509 4.8611393121 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21509063702 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603133159269 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8969358024 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.85 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16962410564 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534845950325 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523973918702 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970823866895 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497730723824 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 58.1214874552 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 10.9000537634 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.