The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in five countries in 2001.
The diagram illustrates how many men and women were trained in high-quality education in 5 different continents such as Japan, the United States, Switzerland, Britain, and Germany in 2001.
In general, while the proportion of females studied in professional qualifications moved upward, the pattern for that kind of other groups of males had some alterations throughout the timeline.
As far as the surveyed stint during the year is concerned, the percentage of females who graduated from universities or colleges in the United States approached 45% in 2001, while the figure for a man who was trained with a high degree program fewer 10 % than figures of females in the USA. Furthermore, the pattern for females who finished the high qualifications in university accounts for 45% in Germany and this percentage was 10% more than that of their male counterparts.
Following this, the pattern for Japanese men who had higher education was 30%, whereas 5% fewer women had higher education. In Switzerland, approximately 45% of males and 35% of females graduated from universities or colleges was recorded in 2001. Finally, the percentage of both Males and females who had a high certificate education in universities or colleges, respectively 35% and 45%.
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in five countries in 2001 73
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- These days an increasing number of people in many cities know little about their neighbors and does not have a sense of community What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest 67
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, in general, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14249114758 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9198195358 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232193348767 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117662061223 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300070799205 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132979112987 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528192965988 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.