The chart below gives information Information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity for the year 1990 and 2010.
The bar graph shows data on the proportion of Britishers donating money for charity by age groups for the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the money donated is increasing steadily from lower age groups to upper age groups in the year 2010. Despite this, the total amount of money give to charity was at peak from the age group of 36-50 in 1990 and lowest in the age group of 18-25.
There has been as slight increase manifested in the given age groups just above 15% in 18-25 age groups up to 40% in 36-50 age groups which fell to around 5% in the group 51-65 years. In the third group of 36-50 there was a massive resurgence to a highest point at above 40% in 1990.
In the year 2016 the charity percentage has started from 18-25 and is accounted as a just more than 5%. There has been a drastic increase has shown in the age group 26-35 in the charity as comprised to 30%. In the remaining groups the static increase has been shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-08 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | kashyap sahil | 61 | view |
- Discuss the reasons why more young people study abroad than in their home country 56
- The table shows the sales in a small restaurant in downtown business district
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipments used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- Some people say that art is an essential subject and every child should learn it in school Do you agree or disagree 61
- The line graph shows energy consumption by fuel type in the United States from 1980 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...36-50 there was a massive resurgence to a highest point at above 40% in 1990. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32203389831 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09864002511 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480225988701 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8406190842 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148243962237 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086095175348 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882461538757 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129315406605 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997747195163 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.