It was easier in past to find a job.
Some people believe it is easier to search for a career that will lead us to a secure and successful future, as now there are a lot of resources to look for and due to improved communication we can communicate easily regarding our doubts. However, I disagree with these for the following two reasons.
First of all, the jobs or professions in the past were very limited which allowed anyone interested to follow one of the professions and reserve a secure future. For instance, the popular professions of the past were teaching, agriculture, army, guards, businessmen, etc. so, if someone were interested in having a better future then they could simply consult one of the above-mentioned professionals and have greater insights regarding the profession, and follow their footsteps. However, the professions today are not that simple but rather a mixture of past professions, and can be really confusing to understand the process behind any job. If the jobs of the past were similar to today, then it could have been really hard to determine what would have been suitable for them. As jobs are changing regularly and different jobs are formed constantly it is a headache to choose one from them that will lead to a prosperous future ahead.
Second of all, the rapid development in technology has resulted in uncertainty regarding the future of any type of jobs of today, as they might be replaced in the future by some technological inventions or by some other new professions. For instance, About a decade ago, helicopter pilots were in huge demand due to the rise of entertainment worldwide. They were paid a huge salary as they helped with aerial videography. However, Due to the invention of decent drones in the market majority of videographers prefer drones as they are very cheap and easier to use which resulted in helicopter pilots losing their significance and getting only a part of the jobs they used to secure in the past. This sort of situation was impossible in the past due to the slow pace of technological development. As the future of even popular jobs of today is not certain it is really hard to predict and follow a path that would lead to a secure job in the future.
In conclusion, I do believe it was easier to find a safe and successful career in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- TOEFL Integrated Writing Task Directions In this section you will write a response to a question based on reading passage and a listening passage You have to consider the contents of both passages in order to write a good answer After reading and listenin 3
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 80
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 60
- Meerkat altruistic 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, really, regarding, second, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80759493671 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87525174281 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481012658228 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8859165454 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285335463319 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096614593734 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100192511705 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198612698121 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134910419733 0.0645574589148 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.