The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of student accommodation in four categories namely room in a shared house or flat with other students, students hall of residence, paying guest with a host family and at home with own family between 1960 and 2000.
It is clear that room in a shared house or flat with other students were the most popular types, in terms of overall, throughout the period shown. The lowest figures on the charts are for students hall of residence and at home with own family.
In 1960s, students choose room in a shared house or flat with other students and paying guest with a host family were the same data at 35%. While the data on students hall of residence and at home with own family were 15%. Over the following 20 years, the figures for all four types of student accommodation increased overwhelming in room in a shared house or flat with other students. While the data for three types decreased at 15%, 20% and 5%, respectively.
By 1990s, the amount of room in a shared house or flat with other students at 65% and reached a peak at 70% in 2000s. Subsequently, the figure for students hall of residence and paying guest with a host family fell about 13% and 5% respectively in 2000s while the figure for at home with own family declined over 40 years but rose again nearly 13% in the last decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 27 | view |
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 82 | view |
| 2017-02-20 | yenngoc | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 27
- The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1960s'.
Suggestion: In the 1960s
...residence and at home with own family. In 1960s, students choose room in a shared house...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...the same data at 35%. While the data on students hall of residence and at home with own ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...udents at 65% and reached a peak at 70% in 2000s. Subsequently, the figure for students ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...mily fell about 13% and 5% respectively in 2000s while the figure for at home with own f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54356846473 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4564455534 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427385892116 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5355207704 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0493063376529 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030034977864 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0129438330813 0.0843802449381 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0393597192201 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00613298539346 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.