In some countries, criminal trials are shown to the public on television. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
criminal trials are being telecasted in many countries. Although the family members of the culprit face problems from society, I believe this phenomenon has many advantages Besides getting awareness about the court, people get to know the transparency in penalization.
There are numerous benefits of televising the prosecution in courts.to begin with, the major portion of citizens are not aware of court proceedings. If this process is telecasted, they will understand the legal system. For Instance, Mr. Charles, a former senator of the united states of America argued that Courts are an important part of our government, and the more our government institutions are shown to the public, the more dignified they become. In addition, broadcasting the trails ensure openness and transparency as well. This develops faith in law and order in society. Furthermore, the public will get frightened to commit crimes as they see similar consequences earlier on television. As a result, the crime rate will be reduced automatically.
However, there are a few disadvantages to this occurrence. The foremost is that the criminals' family members get affected if their faces are shown in the media. Both the offended and their family members get bullied and humiliated by society .for example, according to the charity Beatbullying, thousands of children, whose parents have been arrested, systematically, and seriously bullied in the UK in the past few years. Moreover, comprehensive criminal trials might give potential ideas for committing crimes. It is an indirect way to teach offenders how to escape from punishment.
To conclude, crime telecast creates problems for not only the criminals but also their families. Nevertheless, the benefits like knowing about the legal process, increasing faith in the judicial system, and controlling crime overwhelm any disadvantages.
- write a letter to friend to suggest the sport
- Since most information about culture and history is available on the internet museums are not needed anymore To what extent do you agree 67
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him You ve found another friend who can go instead of you Write a letter to your friend In your letter Explain why you cannot go anymore Say who can go instead of you Say why 73
- Many students find it hard to pay attention at school What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 73
- In the future people may no longer be able to pay for things in shops using cash All payments may have to be made by card or using mobile phones Do you think this will happen one day Why do you think some people might not be happy to give up using cash 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Criminal
criminal trials are being telecasted in many cou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'criminals'' or 'criminal's'?
Suggestion: criminals'; criminal's
...is occurrence. The foremost is that the criminals family members get affected if their fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rs get bullied and humiliated by society .for example, according to the charity Be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56097560976 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08065173029 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.5056951245 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129816179237 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406253099571 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444561369589 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693981034365 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257699891341 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.