The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050.
Population (million)
Countries 2003 2025 2050
Argentina 34 48 62
Indonesia 238 274 312
Italy 54 47 45
Republic of Korea 48 52 52
The table chart give information about the rate of people in four countries for 2003 and have a projected in 2025 to 2050.
Overall, ti can be seen that the population figures in the first year of Indonesia is highest but in the last years of Argentina is lowest. However, we can see clear more if we look at the specific figure.
Look at the first year of population in four countries. It can be seen that the overall of number in 2003 of Argentina is lowest among four countries and have the number is 34 millions people. Meanwhile, this number is highest in 2050 is 62 millions and in 2050 is table 48 millions. By contrast, population in Indonesia in three year is table and highest among four countries. In the first year, have the number is 238 and 274 millions in 2003 and 2025. However, this number have the significantly increased is 312 millions people.
Look at the remaining two countries on the table chart, the rate of people in 2024 and 2059 of Republic Korea have the same number is 52 millions people. Meanwhile, in 2025 ‘ad 2050 of Italy is 47 millions and 45 millions. By contrast, in the first year of Italy and Korea is 54 and 48 millions. So, it can be seen that population in Indonesia is highest than other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere Some people think that the sway is extravagance money on the the arts and that this money could be better split elsewhere I degree with 56
- Imagine you have a abroad friend and they will have spend a day in my hometown You need to recommendation about interest places and what need to do 56
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some employers believe that job applicants social skills are more important than their academic qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Korea) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ople in 2024 and 2059 of Republic Korea have the same number is 52 millions people. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46929824561 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5237979351 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.40350877193 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7586520276 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3846153846 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35376253106 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128874365588 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780027495977 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219015137965 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863295764524 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.35 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.