It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives.
Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages?
Facing risks is essential for humans in their work and family lives. Most of the time, it has many benefits for people's lives. However, sometimes it has some drawbacks.
Firstly, we will focus on the work fields. A hard worker gets money and life lessons from taking risks here. Especially at a higher-story construction site, many labourers work in dangerous environmental conditions, such as dusky air, risky work, and higher temperatures. If a worker works in this condition, that person can earn huge money. In addition, some employees work overtime and at night. Hence, they get a higher salary than other workers. But they lost their enjoyment and family time. However, nowadays, money is more important than other things, and it is essential to keeping the family running.
Secondly, we will focus on personal life. Everyone has both happiness and problems in their personal lives. Especially in a joint family, relations have a lot of understandings and conflicts because on special days, such as festivals, family functions, and trips, the working person gives vast amounts of money to family needs. If only one family member goes to work, that member is highly affected by these incidents. However, family happiness, relationships with family members, and peaceful life are the benefits of taking risks in a joint family.
In conclusion, taking risks offer positive and negative attributes to people. Gaining money, a peaceful life, and increasing family bonds and happiness are advantages of taking risks, and overwork and misunderstandings are some drawbacks of taking risks. However, a person lives mainly for their family. Thus, I clearly say that we obtain benefits that surpass negative things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | maidiem1508 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | maidiem1508 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | thaonguyen2k4 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | thaonguyen2k4 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | tohanhtrang | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keep'?
Suggestion: keep
...an other things, and it is essential to keeping the family running. Secondly, we wil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30036630037 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77089218917 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0065301771 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.35 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.65 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229864270416 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701541524783 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723023081989 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153762481263 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707743497679 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.