Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Communication is the meaning of delivering messages from one person to another. It is conventionally divided into two common kinds: spoken and written communications. According to many factors that affect the success of its mutual-understanding, such as the form of communication itself or the level of directness, I believe that spoken communication is more powerful than written communication.
Firstly, it can be said that spoken communication is more comprehensible. The reason often given to its use of both visual and auditory channels while communicating. When we intercommunicate, not only the speaking language but also the body language is used. For example, hand gestures, face expressions or tones of voice,… are the additional factors that be able to change the meaning of the message delivered. A same sentence supported by a grimace might have a negative meaning, while along with a high and bright pitch of voice it can contain the positive attitude from the speaker. In another word, the words speaking out loud are simultaneously described in a more visual and optical way, which help the listener fully get the messages given.
Secondly, the higher level of directness in spoken communication also makes it more effective than written communication. Nowadays, with the technological evolution, written communication developed into various forms, from hand-written letter to text message or real-time chatting. However, along with that is the “noise” which interrupts the progress of delivery and affects the quality of receiving the messages. For instance, even when two people are able to real-time chat with each other through a texting application, the contexts in which a text message can be interpreted are so various that the receiver can understand the content in an unexpected way. Whereas, using facetime to see each other face to face and directly exchange verbal communication gives the minimum interruption and helps the messages come through without its meaning being modified. The same case is a collaboration between two businesses is hard to perform without meetings and conferences but just e-mail exchanging.
In conclusion, spoken communication can be said as the ultimate form of exchanging information due to the variety of interactions apart from using language. Therefore, accept from the inevitable situations, spoken communication should be prioritized for the most quality of the conversation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ures, face expressions or tones of voice,… are the additional factors that be able...
^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'messages'' or 'message's'?
Suggestion: messages'; message's
..., which help the listener fully get the messages given. Secondly, the higher level o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unexpected way" with adverb for "unexpected"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...the receiver can understand the content in an unexpected way. Whereas, using facetime to see each ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.544 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35447800211 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549333333333 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1934251662 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.294117647 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23906884156 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086421344411 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100584082147 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17096460549 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929865370186 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.