Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working in a project require hard effort and time, thus it could be hard to do all this alone. Personally, I would definitely select to work with my classmates in a group. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, it is more efficient to work within a team. Obviously, when you work with a group, you do not have to do all of the work by your self. Therefore, it will take less time and effort from you. My own experience is an excellent example of this. when I was In high school, my group and I worked on a Science project. The project required a lot of work and tasks. But, each one of us took a single task and work on it. As a result, we submited an amazing and perfect project in a short time.
Secondly, when you work with a group of your classmates, you will have to deal with different students with different experiences. Hence, this will assist you to expand your knowledge and improve your skills. For instance, when I was in college, I was working on a project for my programming class with my team.
To sum up, I firmly believe that working on a project with your calssmates as a group is more effective. this is because it saves time and effort, and it makes you learn more. Thus, your academic level will improve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | younessam | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | Dat_Nguyen | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | Muggle | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 60
- The Salton Sea 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- what you will choose work alone or with your classmates 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ork with a group, you do not have to do all of the work by your self. Therefore, it will t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...rience is an excellent example of this. when I was In high school, my group and I wo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...alssmates as a group is more effective. this is because it saves time and effort, an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 1977.66487455 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 244.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30737704918 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44675563586 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52868852459 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 618.680645161 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4096954451 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.8235294118 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3529411765 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120928842328 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436418244212 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407385702099 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832087597112 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306381855095 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.0 11.7677419355 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 58.1214874552 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.1575268817 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.13 10.9000537634 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.