The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, face-to-face communication is being replaced with online conversations using social media apps such as Facebook, Zalo or Instagram. While I understand that these technologies have brought benefits to our lives, I am still of the opinion that their drawbacks are greater.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why people might approve of the beneficial use of social networking sites. The first objection is that social media is a powerful tool which provides users with many opportunities to have access to huge amounts of knowledge. Everyone can find different types of information about areas of interest and topics which they are learning about. Another significant advantage is that social networks are extremely convenient for information exchange and relationship maintenance, regardless of geographic location. For example, students studying abroad can keep in touch and share photos with their families and friends on a daily basis by using the video calls features of Facebook or various other apps. However, this exerts marginal influence on most users as they may have difficulties using online platforms properly.
On the other hand, I would argue that the advantages of the use of social technologies pale in comparison with the disadvantages. Firstly, these platforms are becoming more and more popular and attracting several new users every day, so people can fall prey to online communication abuse, such as online bullying and harassment. In fact, social networks can be a toxic environment where users can be verbally assaulted due to jealousy of other users. The second disadvantage that should be taken into consideration is the overuse of social media reduces the quality of interpersonal communication and social skills such as eye contact or body language expressions. For instance, many people are so addicted to online platforms that they always stare at their screens during dinners with their families without paying attention to the people around them. Finally, many users who get into the habit of keeping themselves updated with online media have the risk of data breaches. Hackers will infiltrate into the user's account and take advantage of the user's personal information to spread malicious content like scams and malware.
In conclusion, despite several benefits that the use of social networking sites has, it seems to me that they are far outweighed by the potential problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nion that their drawbacks are greater. On the one hand, there are two main reas...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lties using online platforms properly. On the other hand, I would argue that th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 836, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ir families without paying attention to the people around them. Finally, many users who get into the h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cious content like scams and malware. In conclusion, despite several benefits ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37434554974 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86853784375 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0518090254 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3125 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212599997453 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687327503338 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634607418476 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133498804001 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354870075287 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.