Organized tours to remote places and communities are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the environment?
In contemporary society, there is a tendency for package tours to the countryside to be significantly increased. From my perspective, I concur with the statement that this phenomenon could be harmful for regional citizens and the environment.
It is undeniable that a skyrocketing number of guided tours to the wilderness and surrounding residents can trigger several demerits. First, tourists might be disrespectful to the local habitats by devastating creatures. For example, they may flatten forests for camping, killing wild animals for their satisfaction, etc. Consequently, the provincial environment may be noticeably destroyed and the preservation of alive species would be more complicated to complete, especially endangered ones.
Furthermore, the cultural uniqueness of some of the communities, usually ethnic ones, might have disappeared. The key rationale is that as soon as numerous travelers visit those minor groups of people, would a steady amount of cultural influence from visitors gradually affect those minor peoples to alter their customs and traditions and would their regional customs and traditions be replaced and forbidden. For instance, a relatively huge quantity of Westerners reaching the remote areas of Southwest Japan, particularly Nagasaki, spread their religion of Christianity so much to the locals that they soon became Christians, leaving Shinto, the iconic and traditional religion, being forgotten in this province.
In conclusion, I hold a firm belief that a dramatic increase in the number of travelers could result in not only the degradation of the regional environment but also the loss of unique cultural aspects, including customs and traditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | TLan168 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | fangfang77 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...Furthermore, the cultural uniqueness of some of the communities, usually ethnic ones, might...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atic increase in the number of travelers could result in not only the degradation...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76587301587 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21445962688 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2892712956 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134611311302 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506045571238 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304495686106 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778497500652 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213664763973 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.21 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.