Topic: In some countries, schools are teaching foreign languages for primary school children. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
With the prosperity of modern society, the rate of international integration is experiencing dramatically in nations worldwide. In fact, in order to meet the requirements of modernization, numerous countries are accelerating integrated language learning into curricula for elementary school students. While this approach may raise a lot of concerns among citizens, I am convinced that the merits outweigh the drawbacks.
One major ground behind the rising opinion offense teaching foreign languages to children is the fear of losing cultural identity. This is because if students are got exposed to a foreign language at an early age, along with the support of cutting-edge technology, they may have a tendency to approach with unappreciated information about different cultures. Due to not developing a holistic perception, they are likely to misunderstand multilateral customs around the world, leading to bad manners. For example, there are many instances of teenagers getting access to fiercely violent films with the excuse of learning English. By that I mean, those children have imitated a villain from this sort of movie, which do more harm than good for their loved ones. Furthermore, reflecting on the current educational system in many nations, students today are under a great deal of strain. They have to live with hectic schedules on a daily routine so that they can make an overall academic performance for their parents’ expectations. Therefore, educators should minimize their pressure as well as help them find joy in learning as a substitution for studying a new subject.
Nonetheless, in long term, mastering a novel language definitely does wonders for human life. The first advantage is that language is an ideal method to trigger both critical thinking and studious personality in children. Due to the fact, elementary students are still experiencing comprehensive in their mindset, thereby getting a language helps them to develop language part in their brains. In addition, by studying language, they may have a chance to broaden their horizons about the world, and figure out more various ethical identities. Accordingly, this may foster pleasant and meaningful life-changing. Another reason lies in acquiring better career aspects in the foreseeable future. For instance, without English, Vietnamese students may not be able to land a sufficient job, because of international merchandise trade. This means there are more and more foreign companies investing budgets in the Vietnam market, which is predominantly becoming big bosses controlling most jobs. Unless being good at English, employees would not achieve any stable incomes.
In conclusion, although learning a foreign language in primary school may have some negative effects, I believe that this way of learning will bring more value, armed with necessary skills for children in the future. Therefore, both the government and parents should join hands in order to balance the children life.
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of pre school age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 89
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 78
- Topic technology has developed rapidly in the last century Do you think its development is slowing now Why or why not 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...method to trigger both critical thinking and studious personality in children. Du...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 33.7804878049 195% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2532.0 965.302439024 262% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 459.0 196.424390244 234% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51633986928 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 3.73543355544 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00205374585 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 106.607317073 258% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599128540305 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 283.868780488 276% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 8.94146341463 246% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8593564895 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.090909091 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8636363636 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22727272727 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258404549815 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599770559307 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639499834726 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159338192972 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459454620914 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 40.7170731707 356% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...method to trigger both critical thinking and studious personality in children. Du...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 33.7804878049 195% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2532.0 965.302439024 262% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 459.0 196.424390244 234% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51633986928 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 3.73543355544 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00205374585 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 106.607317073 258% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599128540305 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 283.868780488 276% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 8.94146341463 246% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8593564895 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.090909091 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8636363636 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22727272727 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258404549815 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599770559307 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639499834726 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159338192972 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459454620914 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 40.7170731707 356% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.