Topic: The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1984 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the change in the price of bananas in four nations, including Japan, France, Germany, and the USA from 1994 to 2004.
In general, it is apparent that the price of bananas in the four countries experienced a significant fluctuation throughout the examined period. However, both Japan and France showed a positive recovery, whereas the opposite was true for the others.
Looking at the graph, Japan took the lead in terms of banana prices roughly 1.8 US dollars in 1994, which was nearly twofold compared to the price of bananas in the USA. In the following year, this figure witnessed rocket growth to reach the peak at 2.8 US dollars before plummeting dramatically to the same starting point. During the next four years, Japan’s banana prices underwent a considerable fluctuation until 2000 this figure hit the bottom at merely 1.5 US dollars before recovering drastically for the rest of the period. Meanwhile, standing at approximately 1.7 US dollars in 1994, the price of bananas in France maintained a level-off growth successfully before experiencing a price crisis to reach the lowest point at 1.00 US dollars in 2003. Noticeably, in the last year, this figure showed a positive trend to increase tremendously by 0.5 US dollars.
Regarding Germany, there was an unpredictable fluctuation during almost the entire period and finally stable around 1.3 US dollars between 2002 and 2004. Turning to the USA, despite being the lowest price of bananas, making up merely 0.8 US dollars in 1994, the price rose slightly to 1.3 US dollars in the next year and continued to level off for the entire period.
- Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Do you agree or disagree 89
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive What are your opinions on this 84
- Topic Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 89
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 73
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he price rose slightly to 1.3 US dollars in the next year and continued to level ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, regarding, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7243352847 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52962962963 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.7649343015 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.8 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124066539181 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623755120904 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524571504862 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966799058532 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318717215511 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.