Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
For centuries, helping other people be a general debate. There are many different ways to help other people from the past. Many individuals believe our ancestors were willing to help unknown people more than today. However, I think, for two reasonable reasons, the current people have more willing to help other humans rather the past which I will explain in what follows.
The first and foremost reason coming to my mind is that today there are abundant institutes and centers that are aware of people to find who have real needs to help. In other words, there are abundant organized institutes across the world and our countries that work on different types of people's needs such as the demand of some people for access to clean water, needs for food, cloth, and hygiene also some of that institutes construct schools, hospital, and many others work with the financial aid of people. As they have a road map people are more inclined to help. For example, in my country, there is a children's cancer center that helps in different ways children and their parents with a lot of services such as help them with curation costs, accommodation, and more services about treatment needs. This institution works in the whole country and gathers all aid from people and also advertises their help so this made a lot of help from people. Each year they give reports about their work that how many children are rescued or treated for cancer with people's help. As result, today’s people's help is more organized than past and this grows willing helping amount from people.
Another noteworthy reason is that social networks had a great influence on finding people who are really in need. Especially, with an increase in the usage of social networks, some trusted individuals in different situations call for help for that situation, or some of them help routine other people. For example, A popular pop singer Mohsen Chavoshi used to form his reputation on Instagram for helping other people. During natural disasters in my country such as earthquakes, floods, or droughts in some regions, he called for people to help on his page so that people trusted him because of clear movement and routine reports of expenses about people's aid just in an hour people's help were great amount. In addition, on regular days, he helps people to freedom who are arrested because of little amount of money which their debt to others they could not pay back. So, social network helps many popular people and centers send an announcement about happening that need people's assistance thus as they are trusted that helps are very faster with more inclined about that condition reached to needy.
In conclusion, in despite of many elders belief about helping unknowing people was greater because of the increase in awareness of people about them around social networks and the internet also increasing centers that help other people.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...r people be a general debate. There are many different ways to help other people from the past...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... work with the financial aid of people. As they have a road map people are more in...
^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elders'' or 'elder's'?
Suggestion: elders'; elder's
...dy. In conclusion, in despite of many elders belief about helping unknowing people w...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasing centers that help other people.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94478527607 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36733690538 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453987730061 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7277109355 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373139094223 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158702735455 0.076458572812 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047026078094 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254374421974 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704380905844 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.