Teachers affect students more than other students.
Teachers are thought to affect students more than the students’ friends. This essay disagrees with this view, since young people’s interests vary depending on the age gap. Also, many teachers tend to present their material in a complicated academic manner, while peers can do so in a more apprehensible way.
First of all, many teachers cannot find a direct contact with a student mostly because they are a lot older. Since the age gap is noticeable, the interests are different. Adolescents relish various activities, experience different emotions, and most importantly, come up with different solutions for many problems. For example, during my sophomore year, I was faced with a hassle of how to raise my grade point average in data analysis. Even the discussion of the issue with my teacher was futile, as the response was always the same: “work harder”. No matter how much effort I put, there was no achievement. In contrast, a friend of mine who had had a credit for the class gave me valuable advice about to change my way of studying. Taking account of that recommendation, I achieved a good grade. Had I continued to heed my teacher’s method, I would have never handled that problem.
Furthermore, teachers tend to explain concept in a highly intricate manner, making the topic more complicated than it actually is. Unlike me, who grasps even the most complicated information, there are people who need ideas to be simplified, so they resort to their peers’. Teachers, obviously, are not going to assist here, so the students explain the material using their “own” and more clear language. Generally, the outcome of this situation results in the students paraphrasing what the teacher stated, in a way even an infant can understand. About a year ago, I was in a math class run by a teacher who was an eminent scientist but a poor instructor, reluctant to make complex concepts accessible. If it were not for my classmate who could elucidate algebraic formulas, I would have failed the class.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-17 | Anurag96 | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | fmichela | 76 | view |
- The reading states that robustus was a scavenger However the lecturer claims that R robustus was a successful predator because of the three following reasons 81
- The pie charts provide information on how money was spent by an American average household in 1970 and in 2004 89
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 56
- I believe that the best investment is an investment in education During my master s degree study at the Central European University I saw how vital are theoretical knowledge practical 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyments doing things they like to do rather than things they should 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...ment. In contrast, a friend of mine who had had a credit for the class gave me valuable...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, as to, for example, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00890207715 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8808456759 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608308605341 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3122128343 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24995297237 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875562534948 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168197055379 0.0737576698707 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204142450089 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114181073177 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.