The Table illustrates The proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009
The table shows the comparison students when coming to different school among 2000 and 2009.
Overall, voluntary-controlled schools was the most higher number in the first year, however in the different years community schools was became the largest rate than another types. For all categories have a different ratio and indicated fluctuation in every years.
In 2000, Specialist Schools and Community Schools have the same number with 12% of percentage children attending at school, however in the 2005, Specialist Schools showed decreased steadily until 2009 (11% and 10% representative). Whereas, comunity Schools indicated significant increased with the rate 32% in 2005, and until the end of period this type was raised until became the higher number of all Secondary school with 58% of rate in 2009.
Furthermore, Voluntary-controlled Schools was the biggest percentage in the first year, but in 2005 the amount can't survive that category and only represented 38%, and constantly degenarated until 2009 with the proportion only 20%. Moreover, Grammar Schools have 24% ratio in 2000, and sustained refered downward as 12% in 2009. Both of this categories was became a biggest number than another categories in the first year, but the end being a lower categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
- The Table illustrates The proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 73
- Working long hours causes a great deal of stress and can be very bad for one s health VinMec s top management must find a way to reduce this type of stress To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 73
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in chester from 2002 to 2007 67
- In order to reduce crime we need to attack the cause of crime such as poverty and lack of educational opportunities It s not enough to simply have more police on the street and put more people into prison Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...l, voluntary-controlled schools was the most higher number in the first year, however in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...e different years community schools was became the largest rate than another types. F...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the first year, but in 2005 the amount cant survive that category and only represen...
^^^^
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...efered downward as 12% in 2009. Both of this categories was became a biggest number ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...2% in 2009. Both of this categories was became a biggest number than another categorie...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...009. Both of this categories was became a biggest number than another categories ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38190954774 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01701779977 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5210046958 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.875 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225695966482 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105957585629 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771566618802 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149102003877 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709717719654 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.