The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate some changes to the medical centre over a period of two years.
Overall, the medical centre experienced considerable changes during the period shown. The most noticeable differences are the medical centre was expanded and four new rooms with various functions were added in 2010.
As can be seen from the maps, in 2008, there were only three doctor’s offices built along the corridor. A new one was added next to the others while a store room which besides the new doctor’s office was constructed at the end of the corridor.
Turning to other features, the treatment room, the staff office, the reception, the waiting room, and the laboratory of this medical centre remained almost unchanged in 2010. There is a little change in that another new door of the laboratory was built leading to the corridor. In the same year, to the right of the waiting room, the staff office, and the reception, the medical centre has a novel pharmacy whose door opens to the corridor whereas the education room and mother and child room were constructed to the left of the waiting room in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people 78
- The charts show the percentage of male and female workers in country A and country B 67
- The diagram below shows the steps of processing cocoa beans Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woollen goods
- The charts below give information on Internet use at home in Australia between 2010 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8835978836 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47007792558 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7872222511 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143158253278 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769002627626 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424669288707 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101890711987 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441331335609 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.