The following chart shows the percentages of favorite pastime activities of children in some Asian and African countries.
The bar chart gives information about the proportion of children spending on spare time activities in four particular countries in Asia and Africa.
In general, it can be seen that in all countries, computer games are the most common activities among children’s activities, while fewer people read books on the chart.
Computer games account for the highest proportion of children’s pastime activities on the chart. Malaysia and Sudan have the same pattern of proportion, at 50% and 10% less than Nigeria. 40% is the number of Chinese children consuming in playing computer games. Watching television, as the second most preferred activity, has the same proportion in four countries where roughly a third of children. Children consuming their time playing board games in Sudan is 10% more than in Nigeria, at 30% and 20% respectively, while a quarter of children like this activity in China and Malaysia. Reading is the least popular activity among children in Nigeria, Sudan, China, and Malaysia at 10%, 10%, 15%, and 20% respectively.
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 78
- Some people claim that public museums and art allergies will not be needed because people can see historical objects and worksk of art using a computer To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- With deforestation urban development and illegal hunting many species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction Do you thibk it is important to protect animals What measures can be taken to 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a Mornach Butterfly 78
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others believe that zoos are useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both points of views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25748502994 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83139202684 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8999915312 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204045917679 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101590730311 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650994434833 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146346577586 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269379363855 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.