- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What is the cause of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
The significant increase of final goods brings about numerous adverse impacts on the natural environment. Ironning out this severe damage is an uphill, but not impossible. This essay give insight into the main causes and suggests some solutions to mitigate its detriment of the nature and the day-to-day life of human beings.
The consumer goods also called the final goods, are products bought for consumption by the average of consumer, so it is understandable that they cause detrimental environmental concerns in many ways. Firstly, the manufacturing of consumer goods releases hazardous air pollutants which can cause cancer, birth defects or other serious harms. Moreover, they pose a serious threat to the ecosystem when the felling is carried out for the company construction, tissues, fuel and even for the landfills to deposit the wastes including the toxic ones .That not only pushes some untamed animals to the brink of extinction on account of the habitat loss but also leads to ecological imbalance. Secondly, the production of consumer goods is the root cause of ocean pollution.Many studies show that enormous amounts of marine trash breeds the severe condition to the marine creatures. Notably, the marine trash encompasses all manufactured products including plastic items like shopping bag and beverage bottle, along with bottle caps, cigarette butts, food wrappers and fishing gear. All these trashes cause harmful impacts on ingestion, suffocation and entanglement of hundreds of marine species such as seabirds, whales, fishes and turtles. For instance, they mistake waste for prey and die of starvation as their stomachs become filled with plastic and because those plastics are long-lasting, it is challenging to remove them from the ocean immidiately.
Clearly, the unprecedented development of consumer products triggers the natural concerns and climate impact. However, there are few solutions which can help some nations confront with this pressing problem. Firsly, the governments can help citizens raise their awareness of numerous environmental issues caused by the consumer products through the social media so that the consumers change consumption habits to ensure that their purchasing does not harm the environment. Secondly, the companies should be encouraged to promote the sustainable consumption and production. Clearly, building the sustainability in consumption and production not only make the basic needs but also brings a better quality of life by minimizing the use of natural resources and toxic materials as well as the emission of the waste and pollutants over the life cycle of the service and product so as not to jeopardize the needs of future generation. Thirdly, the education is also a crucial element of setting a sustainable life for the young generation in the coming years. Lessons of environment should be taught in every school and kindergarden. Consequently, the students may adopt the sustainable practices at the very young age.
In conclusion, despite the severe impacts of the unsustainables patterns of consumption and production ,all nations should stiffen their resolve to confront with this urgen problem instead of depriving the green life of the next generation. But from my perspective, to deal with this is an uphill and the high determination is required from not only the governments but also every individuals worldwide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | DONGPHUONGANH | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | DONGPHUONGANH | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 56
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 73
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important Why might this be a case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...osit the wastes including the toxic ones .That not only pushes some untamed animal...
^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...it the wastes including the toxic ones .That not only pushes some untamed animals to...
^^^^
Line 2, column 767, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Many
...ds is the root cause of ocean pollution.Many studies show that enormous amounts of m...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1407, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'removing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: removing
...ics are long-lasting, it is challenging to remove them from the ocean immidiately. Clea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s patterns of consumption and production ,all nations should stiffen their resolve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.3376753507 360% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2877.0 1615.20841683 178% => OK
No of words: 525.0 315.596192385 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96281657991 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544761904762 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 884.7 506.74238477 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.1456098628 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.85 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235293983516 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694919271925 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470982112682 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143841467533 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041748472927 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 78.4519038076 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.