TPO61
Both the article and the lecture are about whether an efficient approach is present to save the endangered golden frog population or not. In this line of thought, the author brings up 3 solutions to overcome the fungus infection dilemma. The professor, on the other hand, believes that these ideas will not be effective and refutes them all.
First, the author suggests entering a specific species of bacteria into the golden frog's skin, producing a defined chemical, which prevents the fungus growth. The professor, conversely, rebuts this way and posits that the mentioned bacteria have entered the skin of the golden frog in a study, meanwhile, they produced that material exclusively at the early stages of their colonization. Therefore, the protection earned by introducing bacteria to frogs' skins would be temporary and won't last long.
Second, the author proposes that if the breeding of frogs accomplish in isolated fungus-free captivity and they get released when they became mature, their survival rate will enhance dramatically. However, the lecturer rebuts this notion and states that the released frogs won't stay healthy forever. He points out that even though isolated frogs may not get contaminated, wild animals still carry the fungus and they will pass it to the released mature frogs. As a result, this method will not work either.
Third, the author claims that spreading a natural defensive feature, such as increasing body temperature at the exposure of the infective fungi, among the entire population is a promising solution. The speaker, in contrast, opposes this issue and describes it as a detrimental drawback for the frog. He elaborates that if the frog increases its body temperature when infected, it costs the golden frog a huge amount of energy to spend in order to heat up. Besides, as the frog goes further in using this feature, it would be weak and ill and even die of other causes. As a result, the high body temperature of golden frogs is beneficial neither for maintaining healthy and strong nor for recovering their limited population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Storyline | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | heartqq | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use specif 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO49 80
- TPO42 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13864306785 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6886153921 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0278176758 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.133333333 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517711245878 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157173804717 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07126962733 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289569904882 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418716488785 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13864306785 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6886153921 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0278176758 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.133333333 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517711245878 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157173804717 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07126962733 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289569904882 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418716488785 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.