Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should concentrate only those subjects that they find interesting.
Nowadays, there are some people think that students should concentrate on all subjects equally. However, many people think that they should focused only those subjects that they find excited. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of teenagers should focus only those subjects that they find interesting. First, education selection system for school are believed to equalize educational opportunities among young adolescent regardless of their background. This only focus support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall college enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, just focus on their favorite subjects would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once students just focus one subject. First, all teenagers focus on one subject would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from school tuition and fees, school could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, students focus on one subject that they find interesting would tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in college pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for school admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could spent pursuing more subjects for their study. It, instead, would be a more study viable option if the resources were focused on supporting on all subjects also their favorite subjects.
In conclusion, in this life, education becomes an important part. Personally, I hold positive attitude towards increased academic in terms of globalization economic matters and lesson exchange, however, we also should be alert to the potential risk of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the average house prices in three countries between the year 1997 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel The advantages and disadvantages of this 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 806, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...ting time that these young people could spent pursuing more subjects for their study....
^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive attitude towards increased academic in terms of globalization economic matte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68376068376 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84582729006 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598290598291 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0940543424 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423548950818 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150173960185 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177714445755 0.0667982634062 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26717899671 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182937783486 0.056905535591 321% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.