Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

We are witnesses of this situation where rich countries are helping poorer or developing 3rd world countries. However, we also noticed that it does not solve poverty. There must be another way out to help these countries to maintain their poverty. In this article, we will read about my standpoints regarding this thought.

1st of all, the country I belong from i.e. India, we are a poor country in compare to other developed countries namely, the United states of America, the United Kingdom & so on. Therefore, what I believe is, only financial aid is not sufficient to overcome such situations. Along with this, we must bring a new system of employment, education, women empowerment & last but not least awareness.

Our very first step would be to make the folks acknowledge that how vital it is for every kid to get education. In this journey, we need to get a strict approval from court against child labor. There must be free education system in maximum schools so that everyone can avail that as a basic birthright. Secondly, women empowerment is another essential point to take into consideration. A proper channel of knowledge transfer is an absolute necessary step where they must understand about importance of employment. Thirdly, there are jobless people in our country, and providing innovative ways of work opportunities both on-shore and off-shore is one of the crucial points to avoid such unwanted circumstances of poverty.

In my opinion, above discussed points are basic requirements of any country except for providing only financial assistance.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-18 cusonnui 79 view
2023-04-13 SharmisthaNaskar 73 view
2022-05-02 quytnee 73 view
2021-10-03 Muhammad Hassam Saeed 67 view
2021-08-19 AnhQuoc 73 view
Essays by user SharmisthaNaskar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...education, women empowerment & last but not least awareness. Our very first step woul...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, except for, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18039215686 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87895674706 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0922509154 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3571428571 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193179202639 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620101859974 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863833159826 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12957878676 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846792949622 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.