To succeed in business, one needs to learn and know math. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the development of modern society, there are various methods that are sprouting across almost sources of information teaching workers to become successful entrepreneurs. In fact, some argue that in order to succeed in business, people have to strive for themselves to excel in Mathematics. From my perspective, there are numerous factors that make a contribution to success in business, thus Mathematics is not always the top priority.
Although being good at Mathematics also plays an important role to contribute to prominent business, in order to gain a sustainable player in the harsh market today, requires different solf skills. Due to the fact, almost jobs these days set a requirement for working as teamwork, particularly multinational corporations. In such companies, employees will be divided into different departments such as Branding, HR, or Business department. Therefore, they might strive to excel at certain areas such as creative content, and product innovation as a substitution for Mathematics. The most significant factor is the team leader can utilize team members’ strengths wisely with the aim of working effectively. To give an example, there are plenty of schools today that integrate gifted subjects focusing on students’ talent, such as Nguyễn Hiền High School in Vietnam.
Another reason is that if people are good at Mathematics, they could purchase Data Analysis field, or computer science instead of following business orientation. It is true that without the thriving of cutting-edge technology, workers have to learn and know about Mathematics like before. However, today thanks to the support of smart devices such as software systems, and calculators, especially AI, employees in the business field do not need to spend an amount of time performing hand calculations. As a result, this trend has fostered potential careers, which are data, and market research, concentrating on collecting samples by surveying and summarizing data for the strategy department. In addition, to become successful entrepreneurs, staff have to be well-equipped with soft skills, including problem-solving, logical thinking, and communication skills to deal with various situations at the workplace.
In conclusion, although Mathematics is a great tool for working in the business field, I still hold a belief that other skills and the difference in job qualifications are definitely distinctive from the past. Therefore, so that people become eminent businesses, they should enhance themselves in every aspect not only Mathematics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive What are your opinions on this 84
- In many countries today if people want to find a job they have to move away from their friends and their families Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64599483204 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22701880299 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609819121447 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5191409665 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5625 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0646620779002 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.01987125919 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298566144731 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0365549983609 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302603093782 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.