The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures illustrate how many expenditures were shared for five sectors in many continents such as America, Canada, British, and Japan, commencing from 2009.
In general, the figure for food and housing was moved upwards, while the other major categories was reversed over the period.
As far as the first survey is concerned, the proportion of the food sector, Japan was the highest consumption compared to the other sector, with prospectively 23%, while the other country falls within a range of from 14% to 20%. In addition, the proportion of housing in the US reached a peak compared with other continents, with approximately 26%, and the figure for the UK occupied nearly 24% as opposed to Japan and Canada figures, prospectively 21% and 22%.
Thereafter, the percentage of transportation in Canada was the most common figure contrasted with US, UK, and Japan figures, prospectively 10%,15%,17%, and 20% during that time. Moreover, the figure for health care in the US was recorded at 7%, while the other ones fluctuated between 2% and 4% over the period. Eventually, the proportion of clothing falls within the range of from 4% to 5% was shared for 4 countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | Lananhtranhanoi | 67 | view |
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after development next year 73
- The Charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of spending in a European country from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 73
- There has been increasing use of chemicals in food production and preservation Do dangers outweigh advantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile the other ones fluctuated between 2% and 4% over the period. Eventually, the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, while, in addition, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0824742268 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89855769837 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7664880515 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113530859506 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610249025574 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439799296464 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845689336293 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443525946474 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.