The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1971 and 2001
The bar chart compares the proportion of households in a European country regarding cars from 1971 to 2001. Overall, the highest proportion of households having cars was highest in 2001, with most families having one car. the number of families with more than 2 cars was highest in 2001 compared to other years while the lowest proportion of no car households was in 1971.
In 1971, no-car households experienced the highest proportion, making up approximately 50%, followed by 1-car households at 35%. The lowest percentage was recorded for households with more than two cars, contributing to around 25%, which was the same in 1991. In 1981, The proportion of no-car households was 40%, compared to 1-car households at around 42% while households with more than 2 cars saw a slightly higher proportion in 1971, accounting for around 35%.
In 1991, No-car households made up around 35% of all types of households, whereas that figure for 1-car households was higher, at approximately 40%. It was observed that households having more than two cars in 1991 and 1971 accounted for the same proportion, both being at 25%. The number of no-car households in 2001 was the lowest, at only 25% while that for 1-car households was the highest throughout the period, with more than 50% of households. Notably, the proportions of households with more than 2 cars in 2001 and household having only 1 car were the same, contributing to 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods rice wheat and maize by people in four different countries 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money otgers argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 67
- The maps show a coastal area before and after development 78
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1971 and 2001 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...001, with most families having one car. the number of families with more than 2 car...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion of no car households was in 1971. In 1971, no-car households experienced t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99163179916 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81339609068 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430962343096 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.350319925 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360776861114 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213032041187 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106417780649 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295715046052 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679411511249 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.